Skip to content

Founder-led · US–China engineering teams

Your Engineering Team in China. Built Around Your Standards.

I help US software companies with an existing product and technical leadership plan and build dedicated engineering capacity in China. My focus is recruiting coordination and cross-border team operations, so your technical leaders have a clearer process for adding capacity and managing collaboration.

I'm Hao. My background connects US business priorities with China-based product and engineering teams.

The model I run today: production and user data in the US; the China team works in test and staging with masked data.

Right now, both sides
Seattle

--:--

Pacific

China

--:--

Beijing time

Code and pull requests flow from the China engineering team to the US side; production data stays in the US.US · productionChina · test/staging← code / PRs

01The problem

Talent was never the hard part. The operating layer is.

01

US hiring is slow and expensive

Senior engineers in the US take months to hire and cost $150k+ fully loaded. Early-stage roadmaps can't wait.

02

Offshore usually fails on operations, not talent

Time zones, unclear requirements, no one accountable for follow-through. The code isn't the problem; the operating layer is missing.

03

Informal arrangements break in diligence

Contractors paid informally, no employment contracts, no IP assignment. It surfaces at the worst moment: your next fundraise or a customer's security review.

02Services

Add engineering capacity with a clearer operating process.

Hiring is only part of the work. A dedicated team also needs clear responsibilities, practical onboarding, predictable communication, and an agreed path for resolving blockers. The proposed approach brings those pieces together while your technical leadership retains control.

Service 01

Engineering Recruitment & Evaluation

  • Role requirement brief
  • Candidate search coordination and initial screening
  • Async written communication first; live meetings and interviews supported by AI translation
  • Organizing a paid, real-world work sample
  • Live interviews with an in-person proctor beside the candidate, where arranged
  • Candidate evaluation scorecard, consolidated for your review

Built against AI-assisted interview fraud. In my current role, live interviews can be held with an in-person proctor sitting beside the candidate, and a paid, real-world work sample tests the work itself, not interview polish.

Your call, always: the final technical interview and hiring decision are made by you or your designated technical lead.

Service 02

Dedicated Team Operations

  1. 01

    Onboarding coordination

    Accounts, devices, and communication norms.

  2. 02

    People management & retention care

    Day-to-day management and the follow-through that keeps people.

  3. 03

    Delivery coordination & reporting cadence

    Weekly reports, monthly reports, quarterly reviews.

  4. 04

    Security & device coordination

    Access, equipment, and the standards you approve.

  5. 05

    Scaling & replacement coordination

    Adding people, or replacing them, without starting from zero.

03Evaluation

Sample candidate profiles

What a screened candidate summary could look like when it lands on your tech lead's desk.

candidate_001.mdIllustrative sample

Senior Full-stack

Chengdu · 8 yrs · SaaS dashboards

  • TypeScript
  • Node
  • React
Async writing sample · excerpt

› Root cause: the export job re-queried every row per tenant.

› Fix: batch by tenant, stream to S3. p95 dropped in staging.

› Open question for you: keep CSV, or move to Parquet?

candidate_002.mdIllustrative sample

Mid-level Backend

Xi'an · 5 yrs · API-heavy products

  • Go
  • PostgreSQL

Gate 1

Gate 2

Gate 3

candidate_003.mdIllustrative sample

QA Automation

Wuhan · 6 yrs · CI pipelines

  • Playwright
  • Cypress

Gate 1

Gate 2

Gate 3

Three screening gates

  1. 1

    Async written communication exercise

    Remote work still runs on writing.

  2. 2

    Paid real-world work sample

    Real task, real pay, real signal.

  3. 3

    Proctored live interview + reference checks

    AI translation supported; an in-person proctor beside the candidate. Final call stays with your tech lead.

Fluent spoken English isn't the gate — AI translation supports live meetings and interviews. Clear async writing still is: remote work runs on writing.

Illustrative sample — created to demonstrate the proposed workflow. Not a client deliverable or evidence of past results.

04Planning estimates

Compare the cost of a US hire vs. a BRIDGEPOD team.

Move the slider. The numbers are planning estimates, not a quote.

4
120
Seniority mix
US location you'd otherwise hire in

Estimated annual cost

US hire, fully loaded$777,000
BRIDGEPOD team, all-in$311,040

Estimated difference per year

$465,960

Estimates for planning only, based on typical market ranges. Your actual cost depends on the roles and the agreed scope — book a call for a written quote.

Get my exact quote

05The 24-hour relay

The 12-hour gap, working for you.

  1. 5pm your time

    Your day ends

    Priorities are set.

  2. Your evening / China morning

    The team picks up the sprint

    Builds, tests in staging.

  3. 9am your time

    You review finished work

    Not status updates.

06What you receive

A standard collaboration rhythm.

A predictable cadence, so you always know where things stand without having to ask.

Weekly progress report

  • Shipped items
  • In-progress
  • Blockers
  • Next week's plan

Monthly operations report

  • Delivery progress
  • Team status and changes
  • Device & account inventory
  • Upcoming renewals or risks

Quarterly review call

  • Capacity planning
  • Performance
  • Scaling or replacement decisions

Weekly progress report

Acme SaaS · Week 14

Illustrative sample

Shipped

  • Bulk invite flow for workspace admins — merged after review by your tech lead
  • Playwright coverage for billing settings

In progress

  • CSV export performance fix — in staging, awaiting your review

Blockers

  • Need a decision on export format (CSV vs. Parquet) by Wednesday

Next week

  • Audit log filters · onboarding for new QA engineer

Illustrative sample — created to demonstrate the proposed workflow. Not a client deliverable or evidence of past results.

07First engagement

What a first engagement could look like.

A first engagement would begin with a limited, agreed scope. Before recruiting or onboarding starts, we would clarify the role, technical ownership, operating requirements, and the conditions needed to proceed.

  1. 1

    Clarify the need

    Define the engineering capability, expected ownership, budget assumptions, and collaboration requirements with your technical lead.

  2. 2

    Agree on the scope

    Document the work included, the responsibilities on each side, commercial terms, and the outputs to review. Any hiring or employment route must be assessed before implementation.

  3. 3

    Review the agreed outputs

    Depending on the scope, these might include a role brief, evaluation criteria, candidate screening summaries, or an onboarding and communication plan.

  4. 4

    Decide whether to continue

    Review the evidence, unresolved questions, operating requirements, and costs before committing to a broader arrangement.

The scope, timing, fees, and any employment arrangement would be agreed separately. Candidate availability and hiring outcomes are not guaranteed.

Who owns what

Clear lines, written down before anything starts. Your technical leadership keeps the technical calls; I run the coordination around them.

  • You / your technical lead
  • Hao, within the agreed scope
  • Set by the legal contract structure
Who owns what
ResponsibilityOwner
Product roadmap, architecture, engineering standardsYour technical leadership
Final technical interview and hiring decisionYou or your designated technical lead
Code review and technical acceptanceYour designated technical lead
Recruiting coordination, screening, and evaluation logisticsHao, within the agreed scope
Cross-border communication, operating issues, and risk follow-upHao — coordinates and provides visibility within the agreed scope
Employment, payroll, labor, and tax obligationsAllocated by the actual legal contract structure (see the note on employment)

08Two ways in

Pick the door that fits.

Starting from scratch

Begin with a limited, agreed scope

Start with a small engagement whose scope is agreed in writing up front — a role brief, an evaluation design, or a recruiting exploration. Review the agreed outputs, then decide whether to expand.

Discuss your team needs
Already have engineers in China?

Free compliance check

A free 30-minute review of how your China-based engineers are currently set up: contracts, IP assignment, payroll, social insurance. We'll tell you plainly what would break in your next diligence — and what it takes to fix it.

Book my free check

09Security & IP

The security model I run today.

Built for the question every CTO and every acquirer eventually asks: where does the code live, who owns it, and who can touch what?

1

US production, China in test & staging

Production servers and user data stay in the US. The China team works only in test and staging environments, using masked real data. This is the model I run today in my current role — not a ready-made promise for a new engagement.

2

IP assignment, in writing

Every engineer signs an IP assignment through their employment contract, so code ownership is documented and carried by the employment structure.

3

Access as an operating standard

MFA and least-privilege access as the operating standard, with access revoked on or before the last day.

Security architecture: the model I run todayThe US production environment holds production servers and user data. The China engineering team works in test and staging with masked data. Code and pull requests flow from China to the US side for review; the production data path to China is blocked.US PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTProduction serversUser dataCode review & mergeMFA · least privilegeCHINA ENGINEERING TEAMTest environmentStaging environmentMasked data onlymanaged devices · approved toolscode / PRsproduction data path: blocked
This is the model I run today in my current role. For a new engagement, the equivalent setup is agreed before onboarding.

For a new engagement

Agreed before onboarding

Before engineers receive access, we agree these together. Your technical leadership approves the standards; implementation responsibilities are documented for the agreed arrangement.

  • Approved repositories and tools
  • Account ownership
  • Access levels
  • Handling of production data
  • Offboarding responsibilities

Security & IP Packet

A one-page summary of the architecture, IP terms, and who owns what — built to forward to your CTO.

10Comparison

An honest comparison.

No column of perfect checkmarks here, including ours. Every cell should hold up when your CTO asks about it.

Comparison of ways to add engineering capacity
Direct US hiringFreelance platformsOffshore dev agencyGlobal EOR platformBRIDGEPOD
Time to startMonths for senior rolesVaries by freelancerPer project kickoffEmployment setup onlySet by the agreed scope
Who manages the engineers day-to-dayYouYouThe agency, per projectYou — employment onlyYour tech lead on technical work; Hao on operations
IP & compliance handledUnder US employment; no China-side structureNo employment or IP structurePer agency contract, project-basedEmployment onlyArranged through licensed partners, coordinated by Hao
Security architecture designed for youYour own setupNoAgency's standard setupNoAgreed with your tech lead before onboarding
Coordinator in your timezoneNo coordination layerNoVariesNo delivery coordinationYes — Hao, Seattle-based

11For engineers

We serve two customers: the founders who pay us, and the engineers who build for them.

Join a team
  • A real employment contract

    With full social insurance, arranged through a compliant employment structure.

  • A company-provided encrypted laptop

    Provided through the employment and operating arrangement.

  • US-product experience

    Work on real US software products, in a writing-first async culture with AI translation for live meetings.

  • A named local coordinator

    Someone who knows your name — not a ticket queue.

  • A clear growth path

    Senior → lead, inside long-term teams. Not project hopping.

12Founder

Hao runs this playbook today.

As the operations coordinator for a US SaaS company, he manages a China-based product team end to end: recruiting, day-to-day people management, and all device and hardware administration — and reports delivery progress to US leadership every week, with a full operations review every month.

His current team is 8 people — 3 full-stack engineers, 1 front-end engineer, 2 QA engineers, 1 product manager, 1 intern — run by one coordinator, with production and user data in the US and the China team working only in test environments with masked data.

BRIDGEPOD is that operating system, offered to US software companies as a founder-led service.

BRIDGEPOD is pre-launch, and I'm currently in conversation with my first prospective clients.

“I make the 12-hour time difference work for you, not against you.”

— Hao

The team I coordinate today

HAO
  • Full-stack engineers
  • Full-stack engineers
  • Full-stack engineers
  • Front-end engineer
  • QA engineers
  • QA engineers
  • Product manager
  • Intern
  • 3 Full-stack engineers
  • 1 Front-end engineer
  • 2 QA engineers
  • 1 Product manager
  • 1 Intern

13FAQ

Questions a good CTO asks.

01Do you work with companies outside the US?
Our operating model is built for US companies; talk to us if your HQ and production environment are in the US.
02Who manages the engineers technically?
You do. Your CTO or tech lead owns architecture, code review, and the roadmap. I run the recruiting coordination and the operating layer around them.
03Do the engineers need fluent spoken English?
Not as a gate. In my current role, engineers use AI translation tools for daily communication, meetings, and interviews with the US product team and leadership. Clear async writing is still required — that's what remote collaboration runs on.
04How do you stop candidates from using AI to fake an interview?
Two checks from my current role: live interviews can be held with an in-person proctor sitting beside the candidate, and shortlisted candidates complete a paid, real-world work sample that tests the work itself. Your tech lead still runs the final technical interview.
05How long does it take to get started?
It depends on the agreed scope. We first clarify the need and agree the scope and outputs in writing; work starts after that, so there's no fixed number of weeks to quote.
06What does it cost?
One all-in monthly fee per engineer covering salary, employer contributions, employment administration, equipment and security, and coordination. Exact pricing depends on role and seniority — book a call for a written quote.
07What happens if an engineer leaves or underperforms?
Replacement coordination is handled as defined in your agreement.
08How do you handle IP and data security?
See the Security & IP section and the Security & IP Packet. I'm happy to walk through it item by item with your CTO.
09Can we hire the engineers directly later?
Yes — through a conversion path defined in your agreement. There's no lock-in: our model is operations, not hostage-taking.
10How much overlap is there with our working hours?
The coordinator is US-based, in your timezone. Engineers work China daytime with a defined overlap window for standups and handoffs, and everything else runs async in writing.
11Can the team use AI coding tools?
Yes, under your policies: approved tools only, on managed devices, with no production data — the same rules as the rest of the security setup.
12What if it doesn't work out?
Start with a limited, agreed scope, and review the agreed outputs before committing further. You are never locked in.

Let's talk

Building your next engineering team?

Tell me what you're building. Or skip the form and write to hao50427126@gmail.com.

What brings you here?